Re: Function reference with versions ?

There were also PC-only versions like 6.03.

On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:35:52 -0500, data _null_; <datanull@GMAIL.COM> wrote:

>Before version 6.07. I thought it would be version 5 or sooner but I
>forgot about 6.06.
>
>On 3/20/06, toby dunn <tobydunn@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Data _null_ ;
>>
>> If you look at the enitre ;ist you will find that not all of them have
been
>> marked with what version they came out in. For example look up the floor
>> function.
>>
>>
>>
>> Toby Dunn
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: "data _null_;" <datanull@GMAIL.COM>
>> Reply-To: "data _null_;" <datanull@GMAIL.COM>
>> To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>> Subject: Re: Function reference with versions ?
>> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:14:12 -0500
>>
>> Suffixes, prefixes, and abbreviations used:
>> + (suffix) denotes 6.07 and later
>> = (suffix) denotes 6.08 and later
>> # (suffix) denotes 6.10 and later
>> @ (suffix) denotes 6.11 and later
>> & (suffix) denotes 6.12/6.09E and later
>> 7 (prefix) denotes 7 and later
>> 8 (prefix) denotes 8 and later
>> 9 (prefix) denotes 9 and later
>>
>> From version 5 on it does provide that information. The IORCMSG
>> function available V7 and later. The SUBSTR, SUM, MEAN and many other
>> functions available in Version 5, no suffix or prefix.
>>
>> On 3/20/06, toby dunn <tobydunn@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > Richard ,
>> >
>> > http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/ts486.txt
>> >
>> > Gets all the functions but as far as I know there isnt a document
>> available
>> > thaat has matched them all up to the SAS release they first came out
in.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Toby Dunn
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: "Richard A. DeVenezia" <rdevenezia@WILDBLUE.NET>
>> > Reply-To: "Richard A. DeVenezia" <rdevenezia@WILDBLUE.NET>
>> > To: SAS-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
>> > Subject: Function reference with versions ?
>> > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:21:08 -0500
>> >
>> > Can someone recommend a reference book or document that lists all the
V9
>> > functions and the versions at which the function became available?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Richard A. DeVenezia
>> >
>>
>>
>>