|
|||
|
I am new to xHarbor. I am not new to Clipper. I hav an older
application I am wanting to compile with xHarbour. I am trying it via the demo at xHarbour.com using xHarbour Builder. I believe I have everthing setup properly, or close. When I choose build, I get a reasonably short list of unresolved symbols. At least the majority appear to be from functions I used out of the Nanforum library, and from the Clipper Tools library. For example: _HB_FUN_FT_MKDIR _HB_FUN_FT_FLOPTST _HB_FUN_SWPRUNCMD _HB_FUN_MIL2CIV _HB_FUN_COM_OPEN _HB_FUN_COM_INIT _HB_FUN_COM_SEND _HB_FUN_COM_CLOSE _HB_FUN_COM_RTS I was under the impression xHarbour was 100% compatible wht these so hopefully I am just doing something wrong, or missing doing something. Can anyone get me pointed in teh right direction to resolve these in general? If I have to develop workarounds for some of them I understand, but surely some will work? Thanks, Scott |
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
OK, I found if I added nanfor.lib from the xHB dist to the 3rd tab of
xBuilder's lib list, I got most of the FT_ functions resolved. Happy with that, I tried adding CT3 and CT3COMM lib files, but that does nto help. I am down to these: * A couple misc functions FT_FLOPTST <- floppy test FT_FLASTRE <- last record in text file *all the clipper tools comm functions I use COM_OPEN COM_INIT COM_SEND COM_CLOSE COM_RTS * these are BIG ones to me. These must work. Or a anternative. * I forget, but think these ca from Blinker: SWPRUNCMD SWPERRLEV * I used these to swap out so I could zip a file. I would not be surprised to not see these supported in wndows, I can probably work around them with the new available zip functions. Anyone help, particularly withthe COM_x functions? Thanks, Scott |
|
|||
|
Dear SHORTON:
"SHORTON" <sales07@techht.com> wrote in message news:dc51b41c-f229-42e1-be1e-e2a8b8ebacf1@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... .... > Anyone help, particularly withthe COM_x functions? The commerical packages just above entry level have those functions in them. For the free version, search this newsgroup for mentions of "hbcomm.lib". David A. Smith |
|
|||
|
> * I forget, but think these ca from Blinker:
> SWPRUNCMD > SWPERRLEV > * I used these to swap out so I could zip a file. I would not be > surprised to not see these supported in wndows, I can probably work > around them with the new available zip functions. I've posted sources for these functions on this NG - please search the NG. Ron |
|
|||
|
On Apr 12, 4:15*pm, "luiz Rafael Culik Guimaraes"
<l...@xharbour.com.br> wrote: > Shorton > > com functions on xharbour builder are in ct3comm.lib > alternatives for this functions are the xhbcomm lib, but you need to rewrite > the com functions call > > Regards > Luiz Luiz, David: Thank you for the pointers and help. I did try the ct2comm.lib in the demo version, but I still get the unresolved externals. Is that lib somehow crippled in the demo version? FWIW, I have every intention of purchasing the commercial version, but I wanted to see what an app looks like compiled with xHarbour before spending the $400+docs to help out. I can go comment out those calls I suppose but then I can't test the app. I'd prefer not to rewrite it twice, once for the free version, once for commercial. I wante to verify it is not supposed to work inteh demo version before I proceed any rewriting. I did search for the free version as suggested, but I wasnt' sure if I found it or not. I definately did not find a .lib file, I'm not sure if the code I found was "it" or not. Luiz, you are the maintiner? Can you point me to the software? Being brand new to this, I'm a little fuzzy on exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks again! Scott |
|
|||
|
On Apr 12, 6:23*pm, "Ron Pinkas" <R...@xHarbour.com> wrote:
> > * I forget, but think these ca from Blinker: > > SWPRUNCMD > > SWPERRLEV > > * I used these to swap out so I could zip a file. *I would not be > > surprised to not see these supported in wndows, I can probably work > > around them with the new available zip functions. > > I've posted sources for these functions on this NG - please search the NG. > > Ron Ron, thank you. I saw something you posted that said it was untested. It looked like "regular" .prg code. I'm not used to the power of xHarbour, so that seemed too easy (to use). If that was it, would I simply put that "prg looking" code in a prg and compile with it? Best, Scott |
|
|||
|
Scott,
<<< Ron, thank you. I saw something you posted that said it was untested. It looked like "regular" .prg code. I'm not used to the power of xHarbour, so that seemed too easy (to use). If that was it, would I simply put that "prg looking" code in a prg and compile with it? >>> Yes, it's normal PRG code, which you can simply add to one of your sources. Ron |
|
|||
|
Scott,
<<< Ron, thank you. I saw something you posted that said it was untested. It looked like "regular" .prg code. I'm not used to the power of xHarbour, so that seemed too easy (to use). If that was it, would I simply put that "prg looking" code in a prg and compile with it? >>> Yes, it's normal PRG code, which you can simply add to one of your sources. Ron |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Macro vs user | Ian Whitlock | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 1 | 09-03-2006 11:37 PM |
| Re: Macro vs user | Arthur Tabachneck | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 0 | 09-02-2006 10:25 PM |
| libref for "work" data sets (one level name): WORK vs USER vs User= option | Dexter Road | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 2 | 11-18-2004 10:08 PM |
| Re: libref for "work" data sets (one level name): WORK vs USER vsUser= option | Ed Heaton | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 0 | 11-18-2004 04:32 PM |
| Re: libref for "work" data sets (one level name): WORK vs USER vsUser= option | Dunn, Toby | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 0 | 11-18-2004 03:27 PM |