Go Back   Rhinocerus > Newsgroup > Newsgroup comp.lang.java.* > Newsgroup comp.lang.java.programmer

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 06:54 PM
Wanja Gayk
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??

To: Arne Vajhøj
From: Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com>

In article <50109693$0$292$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>, arne@vajhoej.dk says...

> > I already have a multi-language style for indenting, variable
> > naming, etc. I see no reason to change it for Java.

>
> Maybe not.
>
> But it is still a bad idea.
>
> And it indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.



"You can write FORTRAN in any language."

http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039535


Kind regards,
Wanja



--
...Alesi's problem was that the back of the car was jumping up and down
dangerously - and I can assure you from having been teammate to Jean Alesi and
knowing what kind of cars that he can pull up with, when Jean Alesi says that a
car is dangerous - it is. [Jonathan Palmer]

-+- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net
-+-

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Advertising
 
and become member of Rhinocerus
Standard Sponsored Links

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 06:54 PM
Lew
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??

To: Wanja Gayk
From: Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>

Wanja Gayk wrote:
> arne@vajhoej.dk says...
>>> I already have a multi-language style for indenting, variable
>>> naming, etc. I see no reason to change it for Java.

>
>> Maybe not.
>>
>> But it is still a bad idea.
>>
>> And it indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.

>
> "You can write FORTRAN in any language."
>
> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039535


Funny, but it ducks the point.

And further indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.

I know you're proud of that, but it's actually a bad thing when you're doing
Java.

--
Lew

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 06:54 PM
Arne Vajhøj
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??

To: Lew
From: Arne Vajhoj <arne@vajhoej.dk>

On 8/2/2012 7:48 PM, Lew wrote:
> Wanja Gayk wrote:
>> arne@vajhoej.dk says...
>>>> I already have a multi-language style for indenting, variable
>>>> naming, etc. I see no reason to change it for Java.

>>
>>> Maybe not.
>>>
>>> But it is still a bad idea.
>>>
>>> And it indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.

>>
>> "You can write FORTRAN in any language."
>>
>> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039535

>
> Funny, but it ducks the point.
>
> And further indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java

way.
>
> I know you're proud of that, but it's actually a bad thing when you're doing

Java.

Somehow I think you have gotten Wanja and Gene mixed up.

I have no reason to believe that Wanja is anti-"Java best pracice".

In fact I see his post as being definite but subtle pro-"Java best pracice".

Arne

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2012, 06:54 PM
Lew
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Do C++ and Java professionals use UML??

To: Arne Vajhøj
From: Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>

Arne Vajhoj wrote:
> Lew wrote:
>> Wanja Gayk wrote:
>>> Arne Vajhoj says...
>>>>> I already have a multi-language style for indenting, variable
>>>>> naming, etc. I see no reason to change it for Java.


>>>> Maybe not.
>>>>
>>>> But it is still a bad idea.
>>>>
>>>> And it indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java way.
>>>
>>> "You can write FORTRAN in any language."
>>>
>>> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1039535


>> Funny, but it ducks the point.
>>
>> And further indicates that you are not interested in doing things the Java

way.
>>
>> I know you're proud of that, but it's actually a bad thing when you're doing

Java.
>
> Somehow I think you have gotten Wanja and Gene mixed up.


The lack of attributions in the post I answered is what I choose to blame.

Yes, I should have researched the upthread context. So OK, I blame myself.

> I have no reason to believe that Wanja is anti-"Java best pracice".
>
> In fact I see his post as being definite but subtle pro-"Java
> best practice".


I am embarrassed. You are exactly right. I apologize, Wanja.

I missed your point completely.

--
Lew

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Copyright ©2009

LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC2 © 2009, Crawlability, Inc.