ntservice (VOSRVC.AEF)

Can anyone tell me why this has changed in vo2.7a ???

Both work.

METHOD Init(cAppName, cServiceName, cDisplayName, cDepends) CLASS
NTService

n := SLen(cDisplayName) + 1 <= vo 2.6

n := SLen(cDisplayName) + 2 <= vo 2.7


alwin

Alwyn

It's + 1 when I loaded the sample (VO2.7a), so you must have changed it sometime
in the past.
Just means your displayname has an extra (garbage) character at the end.

I'd look at cDepends though as the n = 0 test can never be TRUE and you'll
always memcopy 2 (extra) characters no matter what.

--
HTH
Steve

I hate to tell you, but the sample at me in 2.7a contains +2 and 2.6
contains +1

alwin

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 14:55:38 +1000, "Stephen Quinn"
<steveqNOSPAM@integritynet.com.au> wrote:

>Alwyn
>
>It's + 1 when I loaded the sample (VO2.7a), so you must have changed it sometime
>in the past.
>Just means your displayname has an extra (garbage) character at the end.
>
>I'd look at cDepends though as the n = 0 test can never be TRUE and you'll
>always memcopy 2 (extra) characters no matter what.

No its not - only sDepends. Either you didn't install properly or you've
overwritten the sample with your own.


"Alwin Nederpelt" <alwin@no_spam-remove-.this.very_quickly.nederpelt.nl>
wrote in message news:gv7ve01ekm1gnq5lbibvn5iu5m7g55unnc@4ax.com...
> I hate to tell you, but the sample at me in 2.7a contains +2 and 2.6
> contains +1

> No its not - only sDepends.

Yep.

Erik

Ok, case closed, my sample's contain the coun'ts i said.
It's ok by me.

alwin

On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:42:06 +0200, "Erik Visser"
<evisser@hotmail.com> wrote:

>> No its not - only sDepends.
>
>Yep.
>
>Erik
>