|
|||
|
Ed
> Where and how do you 'turn scripting off'? You can do it via IE > Do you remove the scripting engine? I've renamed it, created a zero length file with the original name and made it readonly. That way nothing can replace it in the background without erroring out<g> -- HTH Steve |
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
Steve,
I wasn't asking how because I want to do this too, it was to determine what you are trying to achieve. > I've renamed it, created a zero length file with the original name and > made it > readonly. So why do these users have a "personal" computer ? Did you also do this in the DOS-days with batch files? It still doesn't make any sense to me, but it must be me.. > You can do it via IE In IE, exactly, because you don't want scripts to run off an html-page, now that makes sense. But scripts that were installed on the computer? BTW, I was just looking at the ClickOnce in VS 2005, and it looks like there's a lot of effort going into ease of installation and deployment as well as sandboxing applications. Ed "Stephen Quinn" <steveqNOSPAM@integritynet.com.au> wrote in message news:2lahnsFakbjgU1@uni-berlin.de... > Ed > >> Where and how do you 'turn scripting off'? > You can do it via IE > >> Do you remove the scripting engine? > I've renamed it, created a zero length file with the original name and > made it > readonly. > > That way nothing can replace it in the background without erroring out<g> > > -- > HTH > Steve > > |
|
|||
|
Ed
> I wasn't asking how because I want to do this too, it was to determine what > you are trying to achieve. I think you missed the reference to me - it's my machine no one elses. I didn't do it to clients machines - IMO security on/of their machine is their domain (or their IT dept.) not mine I should also say that I've only done this on the machine I use to access the internet, my development machine goes nowhere near the internet. -- HTH Steve |
|
|||
|
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:40:28 GMT, "Geoff Schaller"
<geoff@NoSpamSoftwareObjectives.com.au> wrote: >Dick, > >I have to agree with Ed here. If you are going to trust an exe from someone >then surely you will trust their scripts? Its kind of a bit bizarre to say >that you will allow one executable format and not another. > Hello Geoff, Ed. And I agree with you both. But many users have firewalls imposed and maintained from IT people they don't even know. They may have allowed our .EXE once but as soon as I run something simple as a DOS batch file, it will be blocked. I have clients who can't even download a bat file from our internet site! The only reason I don't use a VO program to do so is that I can't delete 2.6 DLL files while the 2.6 is running neither can I overwrite 2.6 DLL's/RDD's with 2.7 versions with the same name. I'll try it with InnoSetup and look into VB batch possibilities later. Dick |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Re: Possible to run a SAS program within another SAS program? | Michael Raithel | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 0 | 12-07-2005 07:06 PM |
| Re: ouput window full, windows batch mode | Peter Hewer | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 0 | 08-25-2005 01:49 PM |
| Re: Batch mode. How to let the program know it's running in | Terjeson, Mark | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 0 | 06-01-2005 06:29 PM |
| Re: Batch mode. How to let the program know it's running in batch | Terjeson, Mark | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 0 | 06-01-2005 05:17 PM |
| Re: Batch mode. How to let the program know it's running in batch | toby dunn | Newsgroup comp.soft-sys.sas | 0 | 06-01-2005 04:59 PM |