|
|||
|
Hi all,
I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their popularity, etc. As a part of the research, I am doing an online survey for software engineers and managers in software development. It takes just several minutes and filling it is a good opportunity to share your opinion about the motivation practices being used in the software industry today: http://ask.wizefish.com/en/MotivationSurvey.aspx Anyone who does the survey and leaves any contacts will be sent the results. Also, if someone is running a web site or blog dedicated to any aspect of software development we can do some link exchange. Regards, Stefan Kiryazov |
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
On Feb 5, 11:19 am, Stefan Kiryazov wrote:
> Hi all, > > I am doing a research about motivation in software development, > the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, > their popularity, etc. Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals is money, and money is very popular. > As a part of the research, I am doing an online survey for > software engineers and managers in software development. <snip> This would be more convincing as an academic exercise, as opposed to, say, spam intended to encourage visitors to some web page with the intention of gaining advertising revenue, if there were not so many advertisements on the page. In any event, your survey needs the addition of a large number of "This question makes no sense" option checkboxes, as it is unanswerable as it is. Richard. |
|
|||
|
On 05/02/2010 in message
<dabc5b6d-f342-466a-a4b6-8e7034956bd4@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> Stefan Kiryazov wrote: >I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the >most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their >popularity, etc. M O N E Y -- Jeff Gaines Dorset UK I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow, isn't looking good either. |
|
|||
|
Stefan Kiryazov schreef:
> Hi all, > > I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the > most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their > popularity, etc. > > As a part of the research, I am doing an online survey for software > engineers and managers in software development. It takes just several > minutes and filling it is a good opportunity to share your opinion > about the motivation practices being used in the software industry > today: > http://ask.wizefish.com/en/MotivationSurvey.aspx > > Anyone who does the survey and leaves any contacts will be sent the > results. > > Also, if someone is running a web site or blog dedicated to any aspect > of software development we can do some link exchange. > > Regards, > Stefan Kiryazov I am in this business so I can fill in online questionaires. Erwin Moller -- "There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." -- C.A.R. Hoare |
|
|||
|
Stefan Kiryazov wrote:
> Hi all, > > I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the > most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their > popularity, etc. > > As a part of the research, I am doing an online survey for software > engineers and managers in software development. It takes just several > minutes and filling it is a good opportunity to share your opinion > about the motivation practices being used in the software industry > today: > http://ask.wizefish.com/en/MotivationSurvey.aspx > > Anyone who does the survey and leaves any contacts will be sent the > results. > > Also, if someone is running a web site or blog dedicated to any aspect > of software development we can do some link exchange. > > Regards, > Stefan Kiryazov Gotta pay the bills! |
|
|||
|
Richard Cornford <Richard@litotes.demon.co.uk> writes:
> On Feb 5, 11:19 am, Stefan Kiryazov wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am doing a research about motivation in software development, >> the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, >> their popularity, etc. > > Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals is > money, and money is very popular. Whilst people like money, it's not necessary the most efficient motivator. Developers also like interesting, challenging, varied work, work with new technologies, flexible hours, freedom to do what they feel is technically best without being hampered by management dictat and many other things. Anthony -- Author of C++ Concurrency in Action http://www.stdthread.co.uk/book/ just::thread C++0x thread library http://www.stdthread.co.uk Just Software Solutions Ltd http://www.justsoftwaresolutions.co.uk 15 Carrallack Mews, St Just, Cornwall, TR19 7UL, UK. Company No. 5478976 |
|
|||
|
On Feb 5, 9:19*am, Stefan Kiryazov <stefan.kirya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the > most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their > popularity, etc. > > As a part of the research, I am doing an online survey for software > engineers and managers in software development. It takes just several > minutes and filling it is a good opportunity to share your opinion > about the motivation practices being used in the software industry > today:http://ask.wizefish.com/en/MotivationSurvey.aspx > > Anyone who does the survey and leaves any contacts will be sent the > results. > > Also, if someone is running a web site or blog dedicated to any aspect > of software development we can do some link exchange. I suggest reading about the "Two Factor theory of emotion", also known as "Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory". I studied this concept in 1984 for the first time, and I think it is still acceptable today. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-factor_theory Cheers, JR |
|
|||
|
In article
<dabc5b6d-f342-466a-a4b6-8e7034956bd4@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, Stefan Kiryazov <stefan.kiryazov@gmail.com> wrote: > I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the > most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their > popularity, etc. [...] This reminds me of "Drescher and the toaster": A disciple of another sect once came to Drescher as he was eating his morning meal. “I would like to give you this personality test”, said the outsider, “because I want you to be happy.” Drescher took the paper that was offered him and put it into the toaster, saying: “I wish the toaster to be happy, too.” <http://catb.org/jargon/html/koans.html#id3141308> -- John B. Matthews trashgod at gmail dot com <http://sites.google.com/site/drjohnbmatthews> |
|
|||
|
On Feb 5, 6:39*am, Anthony Williams <anthony....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Richard Cornford <Rich...@litotes.demon.co.uk> writes: > > On Feb 5, 11:19 am, Stefan Kiryazov wrote: > >> Hi all, > > >> I am doing a research about motivation in software development, > >> the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, > >> their popularity, etc. > > > Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals is > > money, and money is very popular. > > Whilst people like money, it's not necessary the most efficient > motivator. Developers also like interesting, challenging, varied work, > work with new technologies, flexible hours, freedom to do what they feel > is technically best without being hampered by management dictat and many > other things. > This is definitely true for me; I will trade some pay for more interesting work or a better working environment, at least up to a point. |
|
|||
|
Stefan Kiryazov wrote:
> Hi all, > > I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the > most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their > popularity, etc. .... I don't qualify as a software professional now, but I did work in the computer industry for 32 years. In my experience, software professionals are people, each with their own motivations. Assuming everyone has the same motivations is a basic leadership error. That said, by definition professionals are, to some extent, in it for the money. If they were not, they would be amateurs as I am now. How that is balanced against interesting work, physical working conditions, status, etc. varies. Patricia |
|
|||
|
Patricia Shanahan wrote :
> Stefan Kiryazov wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the >> most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their >> popularity, etc. > ... > > I don't qualify as a software professional now, but I did work in the > computer industry for 32 years. > > In my experience, software professionals are people, each with their own > motivations. Assuming everyone has the same motivations is a basic > leadership error. > > That said, by definition professionals are, to some extent, in it for > the money. If they were not, they would be amateurs as I am now. How > that is balanced against interesting work, physical working conditions, > status, etc. varies. Hmmm, I have seen "professionals" who should be escorted out by security. And then people who do it for personal satisfaction who produce excellent code. The FOSS movement has a mix of these two groups. Being a professional is a state of mind rather than renumeration. But yes, I like to eat too.... -- Wojtek :-) |
|
|||
|
Stefan Kiryazov wrote: > I am doing a research about motivation in software development, the > most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, their > popularity, etc. Watching it all come together in a project after 40 years still has the same excitement. I resigned from a good job 30 years ago to program again as a career telling colleges at the time that I may never work again but I am playing 50 or 60 hours a week at something I love to do. Regards, w.. -- Walter Banks Byte Craft Limited http://www.bytecraft.com |
|
|||
|
"Anthony Williams" <anthony.ajw@gmail.com> wrote in message news:87ljf76emt.fsf@dell.justsoftwaresolutions.co. uk... > Richard Cornford <Richard@litotes.demon.co.uk> writes: > >> On Feb 5, 11:19 am, Stefan Kiryazov wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am doing a research about motivation in software development, >>> the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, >>> their popularity, etc. >> >> Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals is >> money, and money is very popular. > > Whilst people like money, it's not necessary the most efficient > motivator. Developers also like interesting, challenging, varied work, > work with new technologies, flexible hours, freedom to do what they feel > is technically best without being hampered by management dictat and many > other things. > OTOH, many programmers may also despise anything "new" or "different", or anything which may effect "the way things usually are". give them something new, and they will resist, like "this is not how I usually do things", ... it would be like, in a college, them adding soap dispensers all over the walls in the hallways. then, this is unsettling, since it is well known that soap dispensers are properly placed in the bathrooms, and so what are they doing in the hallways?... likewise, many may like a well-defined heirarchy of authority, strong-seeming authority figures, and the sense of "excitement" over the volumes of work being produced (measurable via metrics like money, units sold, kloc written, completing various items on various agendas, ...), ... and, granted, other people may not like this... they might dislike, for example, being expected to stand and greet the boss whenever he enters the room, waiting for him either to say something relevant or to tell them all to carry on, ... other people may also not like attending meetings for the sake of debating over agenda items, deciding on matters of policy, ... so, it may all depend a lot on the person (and/or, the personality types of the people involved...). |
|
|||
|
On 5 Feb., 13:23, Richard Cornford <Rich...@litotes.demon.co.uk>
wrote: > On Feb 5, 11:19 am, Stefan Kiryazov wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I am doing a research about motivation in software development, > > the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, > > their popularity, etc. > > Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals is > money, [...] This was proven wrong by Science. Read Bruce Eckels excellent blog entries about this topic, he always references relliable sources on this subject. |
|
|||
|
Richard Cornford wrote:
> On Feb 5, 11:19 am, Stefan Kiryazov wrote: >> I am doing a research about motivation in software development, >> the most efficient practices to motivate software engineers, >> their popularity, etc. > > Strange question; the most efficient motivator of professionals is > money, and money is very popular. That would mean that the more you are paid, the more motivated you are, which is obviously wrong. Money is only part of the equation. Money is a factor of motivation in capitalism only because of the things that money can buy, and which it means to others. But those things can be gained without money as well, so you would probably be equally motivated if someone provides them for work you have done. See, e.g., Maslow's hierarchy of needs. F'up2 poster PointedEars -- var bugRiddenCrashPronePieceOfJunk = ( navigator.userAgent.indexOf('MSIE 5') != -1 && navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mac') != -1 ) // Plone, register_function.js:16 |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Popular Tags in the Forum |
| motivation, professionals, software |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|