Can I use/reference an OCX in a different way?

Brill!

Thanks for this gem re the dependancies folder thingy - this saves so much
faff.

This manifest thing gets better and better :0)

Rgds

"Mike Williams" <gagamomo@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:e9348b48-e591-440e-aa0e-94f083ce8f1e@s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
On 2 Nov, 01:59, "Mojo" <ple...@dont.spam.com> wrote:

> Yep tried it and up to now (fingers firmly crossed!) it
> seems to work fine. I've tested it on 2 x XP machines
> (one with the file in the system folder and one that doesn't
> have the file at all) and both do the biz at the mo. My
> colleague is going to test it out on Vista tomorrow (as
> I won't touch the thing :0) and hopefully we are in happy land.

Actually I've been doing all my own testing on Vista, and it works
fine. By the way, regarding the editing of the dependency file to
include the desired support folder name (for your OCX files) I've just
had another look at MMM (which I don't use much myself, as I mentioned
earlier) and I notice that there is an option to specify the name of
the desired dependencies folder on the last page of the wizard, so if
you type the name "support" in there then MMM will create the
appropriate manifest for you, so the manifest does not need to be
later edited.

Mike