|
|||
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 10:36:03 +0000, Jonathan Lewis wrote:
> "Mladen Gogala" <gogala.mladen@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:hcihgo$7o6$1@solani.org... >> On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:26:54 +0000, Jonathan Lewis wrote: >> >> >>> The threat of being sued for a derogatory comment (even a true one) >>> being made by a list member was something that no-one else wanted to >>> take on - and you're complaining because you now can't say whatever >>> you like whenever you like because Steve took on that risk. >>> >>> >> My comments could neither be qualified as libel nor slander so they did >> not pose a danger to anyone. Nobody could have sued either me or the >> moderator for my comments. I am complaining because I was prevented >> from telling lazy ignorants off. It is this "enforcing the morality" >> that I am complaining about and that is what turned the oracle-l into a >> useless high traffic forum. In addition to that, such danger no longer >> existed when he banned me for bad behavior. > > > Let me repeat this bit - since you seem to have missed the point: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- When > Steve took responsibility for Oracle-L, the previous moderator had > decided to shut it down because of noises begin made in the US > courts about moderators being responsible for all comments made on > such lists. > > ----------------------------------------------------------- As far as I am concerned, this makes no difference. Having the list in the state like it is now is as good as if it wasn't there. > > Steve took on the list when no-one else would. Had it not been for him > the list would have ceased to exist years ago, and there would have been > no need, or opportunity, for you to tell anyone off. > > It's his game, if you don't like the rules no-one is going to force you > to play. But I am still allowed to voice my opinion. Things have not changed in this respect. He banned me from the list but I can express my opinion here. Also, it seems that moderating the list is about the only thing he does. I don't know if you noticed, but this forum has much lighter traffic than the list so it's much easier to keep tabs on really interesting topics when they show up. In other words, this forum is becoming much more useful than oracle-l. I wouldn't be surprised to see people return to this forum and abandon the oracle-l altogether. I believe that the list has outlived its usefulness, especially with this leadership. Steve Adams has, after all, stopped doing interesting things a long time ago. He's just hanging in there for the marketing effect. > I'd be curious to know, though, how long you survived on the > list after he took over. I don't know, I didn't do any accounting. I don't see the point of this discussion? Steve took a list when nobody else would and turned it into a useless milquetoast forum. Judging by the overall tone of the list seems to be "enforcing morality" there even now, when nobody is talking about lawsuits. Not much else is done there. -- http://mgogala.freehostia.com |
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 12:15:47 +0100, Gerard H. Pille wrote:
> Mladen Gogala wrote: >> My comments could neither be qualified as libel nor slander so they did >> not pose a danger to anyone. > ... >> Things being as they are, I still consider Steve Adams a prudish prick >> who has single-handedly destroyed once useful list. > > I must be losing my grasp of the english language. You mean the English language? -- http://mgogala.freehostia.com |
|
|||
|
On 2009-11-01, hpuxrac <johnbhurley@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> On Nov 1, 1:34*pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > snip > >> > I must be losing my grasp of the english language. >> >> You mean the English language? > > For all practical purposes you might as well just say American ... For whose practical purposes? E |
|
|||
|
hpuxrac schreef:
> On Nov 1, 1:34 pm, Mladen Gogala <gogala.mla...@gmail.com> wrote: > > snip > >>> I must be losing my grasp of the english language. >> You mean the English language? > > For all practical purposes you might as well just say American ... Or listen to Simon and Garfunkel (I get slandered, libeled, hear words I never read in the bible) Shakespeare (but I'm sooooooooooo tired...) |
|
|||
|
On 1 Nov, 18:40, hpuxrac <johnbhur...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> For all practical purposes you might as well just say American ... The official language in the United States is English: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States There is no "American" language. -g |
|
|||
|
gazzag wrote:
> On 1 Nov, 18:40, hpuxrac<johnbhur...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> For all practical purposes you might as well just say American ... > > The official language in the United States is English: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States > > There is no "American" language. > > -g There used to be quite a lot of them. |
|
|||
|
On Oct 31, 9:02*am, "Jonathan Lewis" <jonat...@jlcomp.demon.co.uk>
wrote: > "Gerard H. Pille" <g...@skynet.be> wrote in messagenews:4aec43e5$0$2864$ba620e4c@news.skynet.b e... > > > > > What is "oracle-l" exactly? > > It is a community based on a "list-server" which is a > mail-handling program that forwards any email you > send it to anyone who is registered as a recipient. > > If you want to see the archive for this October to gauge > the level of participation, you can go to the following link: > * *http://www.freelists.org/archive/oracle-l/10-2009 > > You can always simply browse the archive, but if you > want to join the mailing list, start with this link: > * *http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > Newbies, please be aware that the emails posted to the list go directly to spam generators. This may not affect people with sufficient anti-spam protection, but I for one wonder about places that claim to have sufficient anti-spam protection. I was able to drop the work email affected (it had not been spammed at all, then got hammered immediately after the first post to Oracle-L), but more recently it's been re-enabled, with notifications of suspicious emails trapped and the option to receive each. It's still getting spammed several years later. There is a basic problem with that type of moderation, there's no way to know if lurking users are spambots. Read from an address you don't post from, post from an address you don't care about, if you don't already have a spam problem. jg -- @home.com is bogus. “There's less than 1 percent of the citizens in the United States of America that understand the complexity in how to put these kinds of projects together, so why would we want to ask the other 99 percent?” - Malin Burnham, arguing against a public vote regarding a $432M city hall project. |
|
|||
|
On Nov 2, 3:00*am, gazzag <gar...@jamms.org> wrote:
> On 1 Nov, 18:40, hpuxrac <johnbhur...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > For all practical purposes you might as well just say American ... > > The official language in the United States is English:http://en.wikipedia..org/wiki/United_States > > There is no "American" language. > > -g Take another look at the link you posted. English is not the official language in the United States, though it is in some states. This has profound implications where I live, where English _is_ the official language, and 25% of the schoolchildren primarily speak one of about 65 other languages (much higher % in my immediate area). In the Los Angeles metropolitan area, the majority of households are primarily non-English speaking. I think it is pretty stupid to have something against people just because English isn't their first language. jg -- @home.com is bogus. "You also have to remember that when we go to China and tell them San Diego's the seventh-biggest city in the United States, with 1.3 million people, that's peanuts to them. They have more than 150 cities with more than 1 million people. Even a state like California, which has about 33 million people, is only the equivalent of the city of Chongqing and its environs, which we visited on a recent trade mission. So even if we go over with the governor, in a way that's only the equivalent of a big-city mayor in China. " - Bella Heule |
|
|||
|
gazzag schreef:
> On 1 Nov, 18:40, hpuxrac <johnbhur...@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >> For all practical purposes you might as well just say American ... > > The official language in the United States is English: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States > > There is no "American" language. > > -g There is! NLS_LANG=AMERICAN_AMERICA.WE8MSWIN1252 Shakespeare |
|
|||
|
On 2 Nov, 17:57, joel garry <joel-ga...@home.com> wrote:
> > Take another look at the link you posted. *English is not the official > language in the United States, though it is in some states. *This has > profound implications where I live, where English _is_ the official > language, and 25% of the schoolchildren primarily speak one of about > 65 other languages (much higher % in my immediate area). *In the Los > Angeles metropolitan area, the majority of households are primarily > non-English speaking. * I take your point, Joel. The Wikipedia entry says: "Official languages: None at federal level National language: English (de facto)" Still, it's not "Amercan" which was my point. > I think it is pretty stupid to have something > against people just because English isn't their first language. > I agree. I currently live in the UK - where I was born - but have spent a large proportion of my life living in other people's countries and have always attempted to pick up the local lingo. I reckon I can order beer in about eight different languages ![]() > jg > -- Cheers, -g |
|
|||
|
gazzag wrote:
> > I agree. I currently live in the UK - where I was born - but have > spent a large proportion of my life living in other people's countries > and have always attempted to pick up the local lingo. I reckon I can > order beer in about eight different languages ![]() > Een pintje? |
|
|
![]() |
| Popular Tags in the Forum |
| oraclel |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|