View Single Post
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2007, 02:56 PM
Patrick Mast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Clipper vs xHarbour Benchmark Tests

Hello Mike,

> Optimized filters (RMDBFCDX) also under some circumstances are a lot slower
> again because xHarbour does not cache database files. For the last 2
> Przemek said that maybee some day he will add caching in dbf (as clipper).


I have a big application that was compiled with
Clipper+FiveWin+SIx3+MachSix. Since I compile with xHarbour
Builder+FWH+RMDBFCDX my users only feedback is that my app runs faster
now.

Just my experience.

--
Sincerely,

Patrick Mast,
xHarbour.com Inc.
http://www.xHarbour.com

Reply With Quote