Re: Alternative libraries for C, that are efficient
On 4/12/2012 2:51 PM, Willem wrote:
> That's the kind of thinking that brought us 2-megabyte XML blobs
> as "database entities". Some stuff you just can't refactor when
> it turns out it's a performance killer, so you *have* to account
> for that from the beginning. Not to mention 'if it works, ship'
I thought it was "it compiles without errors... ship it." :-)