Re: Which standard?
Nomen Nescio <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Is there any consensus on which Forth Standard is a good starting
> point for a new implementation? I've done a little reading and I
> understand Chuck Moore was not in favor of certain standards to the
> point he didn't consider them Forth.
He's not in favour of any standard: his Forth is in constant flux,
always being adpated to the needs of the moment.
> If no standard is a good starting point, is there any consensus on
> what a reference implementation should be? Any pointers to doc,
> articles etc. would be welcomed.
I'd start with Standard Forth + Forth 200x amendments.