Swifty <email@example.com> wrote:
> Bug 3274050 seems to have ground to a halt... fixed, but pending.
> It's not fixed in my tests of the 4.1.1 beta, and since this is the only
> one of my bugs which persists, it's the fly in my ointment.
> One consequence of this is a security exposure for me. I have a log file
> which has to be a+w so all processes can add log entries. However, it also
> has to be a+r as well, which means that processes can read each others log
Wouldn't it be better to have a log per process, with each process only able
to update its own log?
And separately to run some sort of log aggregator that produces a merged log
somewhere for your use?
Jeremy C B Nicoll - my opinions are my own.
Email sent to my from-address will be deleted. Instead, please reply
replacing "aaa" by "284".