Thread: porting tool
View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-28-2011, 06:59 AM
Caviare
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default porting tool

My client has 200KLOC of working code on an architecture where char is 8
bits, short is 16 bits, and int and long are 32 bits. They want to port
to an architecture where char, short and int are all 16 bits, and long
is 32 bits. Both architectures are twos complement. The source for the
most part looks reasonably well written C90 code, however I have
discovered code which relies on the current architecture. For example:

unsigned char c;
unsigned short s1, s2;
unsigned long l;

/* Mask to 8 bits */
c = (unsigned char)l;

/* May overflow on new architecture */
l = s1 + s2;

Does anyone know of tools that can draw attention to code that works on
the current architecture, but probably won't on the new one?

To be more specific, I'm looking for a tool that will locate code where:

1. a short, int or long is implicitly or explicitly narrowed to char and

2. a binary operation occurs between any two integer types except long,
and the result is placed in either an int or a long.

Unsigned variants are included any time a type is mentioned in the
preceding text.

(2) isn't going to produce as many positives as you might think. My
definition means int + int = int must be flagged. In fact there aren't
too many operations like this in the code, because the code mostly uses
typedefs such as SINT8, SINT16 and SINT32. On the new architecture, I
will set SINT16 to be short and SINT32 to be long.

I have already tried splint and gcc under cygwin. I don't think they can
be made to do what I want. gcc is not available for the new
architecture. A proprietary compiler will be used. I've searched web
descriptions of static analysers, but so far have not found anything
that helps.
--
comp.lang.c.moderated - moderation address: clcm@plethora.net -- you must
have an appropriate newsgroups line in your header for your mail to be seen,
or the newsgroup name in square brackets in the subject line. Sorry.
Reply With Quote