Pascal Costanza wrote:
> Rob Warnock wrote:
> > Pascal Costanza <pc@p-cos.net> wrote:
> > +---------------
> > | CDR - The Common Lisp Document Repository
> > ...
> > | Each CDR document will be identified by a number. Form and
> > | possible contents of CDR documents are not prescribed, but the goal
> > | is to provide the Common Lisp community with a way to unambiguously
> > | refer to a document by way of mentioning its CDR number.
> > +---------------
> >
> > How does this differ from what has been referred to for the last
> > several years as CLRFIs? [Note: This is not an criticism, but a
> > simple request for information/elaboration/clarification...]
>
> We haven't specifically modeled CDR after CLRFI, and haven't taken a
> look at CLRFI when we formulated the CDR "process". However, there are
> surely similarities.

It would be good to put the first two CLRFI submissions on CDR too.